What is the quality of my networks ?
Before I joined the connectivism and connectives on line course from the University of Manitoba I used Google scholar, Lycos , Athens , Blackwell synergy ,Moodleäand open learn materials to transmit to learners in a well crafted series of lectures that contained learning styles a plenty.
I learnt MSN, Face book , made my own web page http://www.linarmstrong.co.uk using front page and videos. I had a dabble with applications such as audacity and photoshop and can use basic functions on my mobile and “Tom Tom” navigation system .
I now know a lot of these were actually transmitting and simple messaging tools. They developed according to need. According to Rhizomic educators I could be said to have grown a fungi that helped me to connect to my friends and paste fluna and fauna to rocks so learners and lurkers could gain from my finds .
My MoodleäUse was to paste useful resources and the learners’ own power points to the VLE. This method was good to keep notes for those of us who like to see the lesson again but research showed the learners never used it for long –just enough to answer their assignment question .
This innovative use of IT earned me and what ever cohort I was observed with, an outstanding grade 1 from ofsted and internal assessors .So as long as information is strung together and connected well enough to make an active classroom experience and using what is said to be the learners’ learning style in it I am considered a good tutor.
After joining CCK08 I now know why the use of networks not groups is an equality of learning and teaching issue . I have created my own first blog http://linarmstrong.posterous.com/ and all the students on the degree course first and second year are connected not just to each other but to year 3 of their course and the web sites of various universities. They can filter information from far and wide across the world using links to educator’s blogs that we found and attached to Moodleä.I see digital literacy as a right ( ) http://fraser.typepad.com/socialtech/2008/10/notes-towards-d.html
The learners have now over taken my power point offering by making their own you tube http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0irRbRfUw5M and posting photos and videos to the web sites. This is evidence of deep learning that will affect their memory and recall and provide a secure peg to hang future information on. They tag and aggregate their own sites and I can see the results from the classroom lesson blossoming and twining with their own searches. The individualization means they can scratch their own itch! (3) The openness of the network can only come from asking the learners to use tools. The tutor must be networked and using tools to do this.
I am now a member of so many newsletters and others blogs like Bradley Shoebottom/ Tom Whyte/ Keith lyons and this has added greatly to my thoughts about IT and dyslexia. My study has grown effortlessly and suddenly I am competent , independent learner.
My voice often resonates with others blogs or adds a bloom or two to create a picture of knowledge. People around the world in educational situations are tackling the same issues as I am and the feeling of being grounded and connected to professional communities makes the terrain safer. Many guides help to navigate my way.
So in meetings and discussions I am confident to offer opinions backed by professional communities and arguments forwarded by people who have studied and reflected a whole lot longer than I have and can offer a well thought out proposition to tackle problems and challenges that worry college leaders such as openness and licenses.(4 ) http://www.downes.ca/post/33401
Innovations seem possible in a world where we tutors try to fit in such a lot :write publish, teach, mark papers and get some family time in.
My new found “Slide Share” and “Blink T.V” resources have enlightened our learners and I have passed them onto other tutors. I observe and help tutors who struggle to mix their classroom offer from the basic fruit of power point and the bitter plant of Moodleä. I see through research that Moodleäat college is used only by tutors and often as a transmitter -notes for learners to copy or cut and paste to assignments. I am teaching a learning theory of connectivism whenever I feedback from the observation as it covers differentiation much better and learner’s voice and other buzz words such as lifelong learning.
I did the course to improve my teaching (it was under £300 to enrol) and did not expect too much to come out of it but the wealth of creative visual materials and excellent academic papers to show me how to teach are so worth it. I can make a whole nourishing environment with others that satisfies and serves the assessments and measurements of today. The new free journals and organisations I have joined feed great innovations and updates straight to my computer .Two very useful ones are Future lab and Brandon hall research which I will use to do a part of the child studies development day.
This course has influenced my own learning so much I feel sure connectivism works. I have passed it on to e learning directors , librarians, cohort leaders and Techies at college as answers to finding the student voice (Huge government initiative) answers to cost effective networking with other colleges offering the same courses (a big business initiative) and as an answer to working co-operatively with employers to supply skills for the future (Leitch report initiative).
The behaviour and control of huge numbers of disaffected youngsters now being forced to attend college also can be answered with a connectivism design.(A huge politicians dream in the present context)
The course has influenced me to put more emphasis onto students to get connected as seen in the video made in the classroom when we discussed racism.( to be linked to you tube as soon as I get the copy)
Connectivity will challenge the organisation to become fit for their employees equality forums by joining up female or gays or black workers and giving them their own spaces and connections with others in the same work.
I strive to use designs in my teaching that is all about equal access and power to learners and this way of looking at things really has moved this to another level.
I have started innovative collaborative projects such as a childstudies wiki
http://childstudies-nwhc.wikispaces.com/Wiki+Help
And students blogs
http://noonooislearning.blogspot.com/
http://hazelarmstrong.blogspot.com/2008/11/moral-development-kohlberg-1973.html#
http://claireparratts.blogspot.com/
http://www.crystal6323.blogspot.com/
http://kellyfenners.blogspot.com/
http://jensnapes.blogspot.com/
http://www.georginaglover.blogspot.com/
http://www.jamie-lee-2ndyear.blogspot.com/
and supported the library staff to bid to the innovation fund for Clickview .
Other tutors on the degree courses enjoy seeing the context of their students lives and college work-the students help each other to contextualise work requirements. Their comments and reflections blow me away. They write because it interests them not because I have set a paper that must be handed in. Not all learners are prolific writers some watch and read without anyone knowing until they comment in class. The lurkers enjoy reading and bringing comments and personal support back to the classroom to create a caring ,learning community where personal thoughts get free when ever they are created not when the tutor points a finger and says “What do you think?”
Level 2 learners have ,according to my research 50% already authored on their own social sites. They make dance videos and photo collections and publish them to the web.In childstudies the skills to do this are used for example to do a short video of theorists that travelled through time to help learners in childstudies with their college work. The library you tube (uk.youtube.com/NWHClibrary ) and childstudies wiki carries this type of materials to help learners through networking which is much more dynamic than transmitting on one VLE.
Thanks to the course from Canada CCK08 I am now in a position to critically analyse the packaged on line courses that are offered to the college at great expense and talk about creative commons licence and other copyright laws.
The quality of my learning networks have exceeded my expectations .To consider the course a success I wanted to add to my Phd chapters but I have actually lived/experienced a whole evolution of my learning theory.
I have been honoured to join in and see and hear brilliant media created by people who just want to share .This suits my philosophy there is no great glory in being the know all but there is a real satisfaction In teaching a learner to fish and feeding him for life .
The course influenced the process of learning and teaching in my classrooms and the other day I said to another tutor the materials will belong to the learners even when I lock them out of the course Moodleä because a lot of resources are now created and shared by them on their own spaces. His eyebrows shot up because the letting go of the stuff we see as our qualified professional opinion could change a culture based on years of practice.
I know this culture should be challenged and changed because it suits the culture and context –or zone of proximinal development of the individual learner. We have digital learners and need a learning theory to go with it.
The lessons still to be researched and still outstanding for me are about getting the mix right for each level of learner. Tutors are scared of safety and censure everything so need help in building confidence to let go. The pilt on the child studies corridor has shown learners have not uploaded anything worrying but one renegade or disruptive voices might pull the whole cohort off course due to unprofessional or immature needs for an uprising and tutors need to teach netiquette and handle their virtual space as well as they can if a problem does arise. We teach table manners by sitting with our children at the table so need tutors on the net to teach filtering and using information.
The very fact the people who choose to write most can be represented by a power law means to me the web is not representative, not a democracy since some voices will be heard. Some could be subversive, unhelpful, bullying or just add to the confusion. The development of netiquette has plenty of opinions and tutors will just have to negotiate the right mix for each cohort of learners.
Connectivist principles greatly help my own personal development as a researcher and a learner and –my aim for this CCK08 course was that as a tutor, I can really make a ittle step into technology. Make a difference in a world that insists on measuring my teaching and the learners progress In terms of exam progress. I think I’ve gained some learning for life!
Many thanks to all on the CCK08.
Comments [0]